It Was Always... Liverpool

It Was Always... Liverpool

Liverpool’s Build-Up Play Broke Down Under Pressure – The Stats Prove It

A closer look at where the game turned tactically, and how Chelsea’s press suffocated Liverpool’s rhythm.

Greig Hopcroft's avatar
Greig Hopcroft
Oct 06, 2025
∙ Paid
Share
Upgrade to paid to play voiceover

There is something about Stamford Bridge that always sharpens the senses. The tension, the geometry of the pitch, the way both Liverpool and Chelsea treat every blade of grass like it owes them something. But in this Premier League encounter, it was not the usual end-to-end chaos. It was more calculated, more layered, and for Liverpool, ultimately more frustrating.

This 2-1 loss was not just about the scoreline. It was about patterns, positioning, and the growing tension between tactical intention and on-pitch execution. Arne Slot’s side showed enough to win it, but failed to manage the key moments. That is what bites the hardest.

Liverpool’s Shape Looked Right, Until It Didn’t

In the first 80 minutes of this Premier League clash, Liverpool were better. That is not just opinion; it is what the data tells us. At the 81-minute mark, FotMob’s cumulative xG had Liverpool at 1.15 compared to Chelsea’s 0.29. The goal threat was coming from the Reds. The structure was working. The midfield was competing.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 It Was Always... Liverpool
Publisher Privacy ∙ Publisher Terms
Substack
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture